[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801071736.39782.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 17:36:39 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.osdl.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: Rename suspend/hibernation stuff for clarity
On Monday, 7 of January 2008, Pavel Machek wrote:
> kernel/suspend_64.c and power/cpu.c were equivalent. Move them into
> power/cpu_*.c for consistency.
>
> power/swsusp.S and kernel/suspend_asm_64.S were both misnamed and
> equivalent. Merge then minto power/hibernation_*.S.
Well, all of that are changes in the right direction, but I'm not sure if it's
the right time to do that just now. For example, suspend_64.c in your patch
is missing the comments on __save/restore_processor_state() already queued
up for 2.6.25 by Ingo.
Any chance to base the patch on top of the mm branch of
/pub/scm / linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git ?
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists