[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080107143217.11b0fce1@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 14:32:17 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@...com>,
Nick Dokos <nicholas.dokos@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/19] VM pageout scalability improvements
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 11:07:54 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
>
> > We see this on both NUMA and non-NUMA. x86_64 and ia64. The basic
> > criteria to reproduce is to be able to run thousands [or low 10s of
> > thousands] of tasks, continually increasing the number until the system
> > just goes into reclaim. Instead of swapping, the system seems to
> > hang--unresponsive from the console, but with "soft lockup" messages
> > spitting out every few seconds...
>
> Ditto here.
I have some suspicions on what could be causing this.
The most obvious suspect is get_scan_ratio() continuing to return
100 file reclaim, 0 anon reclaim when the file LRUs have already
been reduced to something very small, because reclaiming up to that
point was easy.
I plan to add some code to automatically set the anon reclaim to
100% if (free + file_active + file_inactive <= zone->pages_high),
meaning that reclaiming just file pages will not be able to free
enough pages.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists