[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4782B4B9.2020608@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:24:41 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
CC: Bodo Eggert <7eggert@....de>,
Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David P. Reed" <dpreed@...d.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@...il.com>,
Paul Rolland <rol@...917.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
rol@...be.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: provide a DMI based port 0x80 I/O delay override.
Rene Herman wrote:
>
> Is this only about the ones then left for things like legacy PIC and
> PIT? Does anyone care about just sticking in a udelay(2) (or 1) there as
> a replacement and call it a day?
>
PIT is problematic because the PIT may be necessary for udelay setup.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists