[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4781C8B5.6050207@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 15:37:41 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] sg_ring: a ring of scatterlist arrays
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Monday 07 January 2008 16:01:40 Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> But we hit the same problems:
>>>
>>> 1) sg_chain loses information. The clever chain packaging makes reading
>>> easy, but manipulation is severely limited. You can append to your own
>>> chains by padding, but not someone elses. This works for SCSI, but what
>>> about the rest of us? And don't even think of joining mapped chains: it
>>> will almost work.
>> You can append by allocating one more element on the chain to be
>> appended and moving the last element of the first chain to it while
>> using the last element for chaining.
>
> Hi Tejun,
>
> Nice try! Even ignoring the ugliness of undoing such an operation if the
> caller doesn't expect you to mangle their chains, consider a one-element sg
> array. :(
Heh heh, that can be dealt with by skipping the first chain if the first
chain is empty after chaining. Please take a look at
ata_sg_setup_extra() in the following.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/tj/libata-dev.git;a=blob;f=drivers/ata/libata-core.c;h=32dde5bbc75ed53e89ac17040da2cd0621a37161;hb=c8847e473a4a2844244784226eb362be10d52ce9
That said, yeah, it's seriously ugly. Restoring the original sg is ugly
too. I definitely agree that we need some improvements here.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists