[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4782CDCE.2030209@goop.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:11:42 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 8] x86: page.h: unify constants
Andi Kleen wrote:
> THREAD_ORDER should be used on 32bit too.
>
> 32bit also has the equivalent of irq stacks (quite similar)
> and exception stacks (somewhat different). Currently they use
> other defines, but they could use the same. Also i386 has varying
> irqstack orders disabling them with 8k stacks, but that is something
> that would be best dropped and irqstacks always used imho.
> [...]
> It might be, but it's not a 64bit specific concept.
>
OK. That's out of the scope of these particular patches, since they're
restricting themselves to just unifying what's there. Another pass
could definitely tidy a lot more up.
> Yes they do, but hardcoding that doesn't make sense because it varies.
> We already got CPUs with 36, 38, 40 and 48 bits phys size.
>
> The only size that could be hard coded would be 52 bit (theoretical max), but
> that also doesn't make sense if all we want to do is to mask off NX.
>
OK. I'll see how much removing it gains us.
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists