[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801081031.06826.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:31:04 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hch@...radead.org, serue@...ibm.com, viro@....linux.org.uk,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, kzak@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: util-linux-ng: unprivileged mounts support
On Tuesday 08 January 2008, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> --- util-linux-ng.orig/configure.ac 2008-01-07 21:40:22.000000000 +0100
> +++ util-linux-ng/configure.ac 2008-01-07 21:40:50.000000000 +0100
> @@ -91,6 +92,11 @@ fi
> UTIL_CHECK_LIB(util, openpty)
> UTIL_CHECK_LIB(termcap, tgetnum)
>
> +UTIL_CHECK_LIB(cap, cap_get_proc)
> +if test $have_cap = no; then
> + AC_MSG_ERROR([libcap is required for mount]);
> +fi
this should be optional and it should be controlled with an AC_ARG_WITH()
with all the non-linux changes that have gone in, does there need to be header
checks here and then have mount.c key off of them ? i'm thinking so ...
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (836 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists