| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:12:15 +0100 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Bryan Wu <cooloney.lkml@...il.com> CC: Michal Simek <simekm2@....cvut.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, monstr@...str.eu Subject: Re: New linux arch Bryan Wu wrote: > On Jan 7, 2008 7:29 PM, Michal Simek <simekm2@....cvut.cz> wrote: >> I checked whole code with checkpatch.pl script to avoid code violations. >> I hope I resolve the most of coding style problems. > > Yes, passing checkpatch.pl is required by LKML. checkpatch.pl only gives guidance; it is not a hard requirement. You should have good reasons if you deviate from it though. Also check with sparse (Documentation/sparse.txt). And there is much more you should have a look at before you send proposed patches, see Documentation/SubmitChecklist. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- ---= -=--- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists