linux-kernel - Re: New linux arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4783AEEF.6090704@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:12:15 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Bryan Wu <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
CC:	Michal Simek <simekm2@....cvut.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	monstr@...str.eu
Subject: Re: New linux arch

Bryan Wu wrote:
> On Jan 7, 2008 7:29 PM, Michal Simek <simekm2@....cvut.cz> wrote:
>> I checked whole code with checkpatch.pl script to avoid code violations.
>> I hope I resolve the most of coding style problems.
> 
> Yes, passing checkpatch.pl is required by LKML.

checkpatch.pl only gives guidance; it is not a hard requirement.  You
should have good reasons if you deviate from it though.

Also check with sparse (Documentation/sparse.txt).  And there is much
more you should have a look at before you send proposed patches, see
Documentation/SubmitChecklist.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- ---= -=---
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/