linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Deprecate checkpatch.pl --file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1199817208.1756.47.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Tue, 08 Jan 2008 10:33:28 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deprecate checkpatch.pl --file


On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 13:20 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 10:01:19AM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > It is a simple pain/benefit issue.
> > > Fixing the 25 errors and 13 warnings in kernel/profile.c may look
> > > like an easy task but then we put additional burden on the 10 people
> > > that have patches pending for this file.
> > 
> > This goes for all patches on kernel/profile.c tho .. If I make a big mod
> > to kernel/profile.c, that will screw up anyone else who has patches for
> > that file..
> 
> Obviously, but why make it worse?  And what's more important?  A
> "clean tree" (especially when some of the things that checkpatch.pl
> flag are arbitrary and Not All That Important), or wasting developers'
> time invalidating potentially huge number of patches thanks to cleanup
> patches?

What I was saying in my first email was we can throttle "patches"
arbitrarily (I think Andrew/Linus even have a merge period for these
types of patches) ..  So that's not the issue .. I feel style clean ups
are fundamentally good.. So what we don't want to do is discourage the
creation of good patches, which is what I think Andi is doing..

If there's something in checkpatch.pl that you think is "Not All That
Important", than send a patch to remove those cases and we can discuss
that directly.. I'm not saying the tool is perfect..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/