[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080108192657.GC26491@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:26:57 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: travis@....com
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 06:11:42PM -0800, travis@....com wrote:
>
> This patchset simplifies the code that arches need to maintain to support
> per cpu functionality. Most of the code is moved into arch independent
> code. Only a minimal set of definitions is kept for each arch.
>
> The patch also unifies the x86 arch so that there is only a single
> asm-x86/percpu.h
>
> V1->V2:
> - Add support for specifying attributes for per cpu declarations (preserves
> IA64 model(small) attribute).
> - Drop first patch that removes the model(small) attribute for IA64
> - Missing #endif in powerpc generic config / Wrong Kconfig
> - Follow Randy's suggestions on how to do the Kconfig settings
>
> V2->V3:
> - fix x86_64 non-SMP case
> - change SHIFT_PTR to SHIFT_PERCPU_PTR
> - fix various percpu_modcopy()'s to reference correct per_cpu_offset()
> - s390 has a special way to determine the pointer to a per cpu area
In your changelog comments you have this:
V1->V2
- ...
V2->V3
- ...
But that really belongs below the "end-of-changelog" comment as this info
is relevant only for this submission to lkml and not in whats get committed.
As your submission did not include an RFC I assume this is expected to be
the final version.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists