[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801081440.49683.vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:40:49 -0500
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 14:21:57 Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
> > The on-chip Blackfin MMC/SD/SDIO host controller has the ability to do
> > 1-bit MMC, 1-bit/4-bit SD, and 1-bit/4-bit SDIO. Thus the current
> > convention of MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA meaning "your host controller can do
> > 1-bit or 4-bit for all modes" is insufficient for our needs. The
> > attached patch splits MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA into MMC_CAP_MMC_4_BIT_DATA and
> > MMC_CAP_SD_4_BIT_DATA and updates all host controllers to include these
> > in their caps and then changes existing code to check the new defines.
> > At the moment, SD/SDIO are lumped into MMC_CAP_SD_4_BIT_DATA ... should I
> > bother with splitting that into SD and SDIO as well while I'm doing this
> > ?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
>
> I fail to see why you need to split MMC and SD. Could you elaborate why the
> controller won't work with MMC cards? I haven't seen any differences from
> SD.
i dont understand what's confusing. the Blackfin on chip host controller only
supports 1-bit MMC, but it supports 4-bit SD/SDIO. this is a fact. while it
may be a stupid decision, it is what it is, and i need the framework made
more flexible in order to get the Blackfin driver merged cleanly. we do
software for hardware, we dont do hardware.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists