[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080108152245.3a8b415f@bree.surriel.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:22:45 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 20:58:04 +0100
"Paolo Ciarrocchi" <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com> wrote:
> -static const struct file_operations rtc_fops = {
> +static long rtc_fioctl(struct file_operations rtc_fops)
> +{
> + lock_kernel();
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .llseek = no_llseek,
> .read = rtc_read,
> .poll = rtc_poll,
> - .ioctl = rtc_ioctl,
> + .unlocked_ioctl = rtc_ioctl,
> .open = rtc_open,
> .release = rtc_release,
> .fasync = rtc_fasync,
> + unlock_kernel();
> };
This is a struct with function pointers, not a function.
No wonder it doesn't compile after you tried turning it into one :)
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists