lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:14:11 -0500
From:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
To:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...dowen.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Deprecate checkpatch.pl --file

On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 12:19:44PM -0800, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > But is discourage the creation of pure clean-up patches because it
> > may have a disturbing effect on several other peoples work.
> 
> pure clean ups are _good_ patches , are they not?
> 

Not necessarily.  Whether or not it is requires common sense, and very
often we get enthusiastic new-comers (some of them with very weak C
programming skills :-) who might try to use checkpatch.pl.  So we
can't assume that they will know when a pure clean-up patch is a good
thing, and when it's a waste of everyone's time, including theirs.

That's why I think the warning is a good thing.  It makes it more
likely that this gets communicated to the enthusiastic, well-meaning,
newcomer.  Someone who is more experienced and who knows how to
determine whether some driver is ancient and not being worked on, and
hence a pure clean-up patch won't be screwing up other developers,
will know how to suppress the warning.  (OTOH, how important is it in
the grand scheem of things to create or apply a pure clean-up patch on
a patch that few people if any are looking at?)

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ