[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801090022.55589.a1426z@gawab.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:22:55 +0300
From: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFD] Incremental fsck
Andi Kleen wrote:
> Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> writes:
> > Now, there are good reasons for doing periodic checks every N mounts
> > and after M months. And it has to do with PC class hardware. (Ted's
> > aphorism: "PC class hardware is cr*p").
>
> If these reasons are good ones (some skepticism here) then the correct
> way to really handle this would be to do regular background scrubbing
> during runtime; ideally with metadata checksums so that you can actually
> detect all corruption.
>
> But since fsck is so slow and disks are so big this whole thing
> is a ticking time bomb now. e.g. it is not uncommon to require tens
> of minutes or even hours of fsck time and some server that reboots
> only every few months will eat that when it happens to reboot.
> This means you get a quite long downtime.
Has there been some thought about an incremental fsck?
You know, somehow fencing a sub-dir to do an online fsck?
Thanks for some thoughts!
--
Al
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists