linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Fix dentry handling on create error, unlink, and inode destroy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:58:07 -0600
From:	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shaggy@...ibm.com,
	sandeen@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eCryptfs: Fix dentry handling on create error, unlink, and inode destroy

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:45:17PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 23:25:42 -0600 Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@...ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > --- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
> > @@ -120,22 +120,9 @@ ecryptfs_do_create(struct inode *directory_inode,
> >  	rc = ecryptfs_create_underlying_file(lower_dir_dentry->d_inode,
> >  					     ecryptfs_dentry, mode, nd);
> >  	if (rc) {
> > -		struct inode *ecryptfs_inode = ecryptfs_dentry->d_inode;
> > -		struct ecryptfs_inode_info *inode_info =
> > -			ecryptfs_inode_to_private(ecryptfs_inode);
> > -
> > -		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: Error creating underlying file; "
> > -		       "rc = [%d]; checking for existing\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > -		if (inode_info) {
> > -			mutex_lock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -			if (!inode_info->lower_file) {
> > -				mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -				printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to set underlying "
> > -				       "file; rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > -				goto out_lock;
> > -			}
> > -			mutex_unlock(&inode_info->lower_file_mutex);
> > -		}
> > +		printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Failure to create dentry in lower fs; "
> > +		       "rc = [%d]\n", __FUNCTION__, rc);
> > +		goto out_lock;
> >  	}
> >  	rc = ecryptfs_interpose(lower_dentry, ecryptfs_dentry,
> >  				directory_inode->i_sb, 0);
> 
> Will this cause an undesirable log storm if the underlying fs runs
> out of space?

When you're bumping up against the end of your storage space, you will
get a lot more that just this message in your logs. There are printk's
in ecryptfs_write_lower(), ecryptfs_encrypt_page(), ecryptfs_write(),
and ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents() that will get pretty
noisy. Is it worth wrapping those in a higher level of verbosity?

Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/