[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801081414230.4281@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:18:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>
Subject: Re: [patch 03/19] define page_file_cache() function
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Define page_file_cache() function to answer the question:
> is page backed by a file?
> +static inline int page_file_cache(struct page *page)
> +{
> + if (PageSwapBacked(page))
> + return 0;
Could we call this PageNotFileBacked or so? PageSwapBacked is true for
pages that are RAM based. Its a bit confusing.
> Index: linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/migrate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1.orig/mm/migrate.c 2008-01-02 12:37:14.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc6-mm1/mm/migrate.c 2008-01-02 12:37:22.000000000 -0500
> @@ -546,6 +546,8 @@ static int move_to_new_page(struct page
> /* Prepare mapping for the new page.*/
> newpage->index = page->index;
> newpage->mapping = page->mapping;
> + if (PageSwapBacked(page))
> + SetPageSwapBacked(newpage);
>
> mapping = page_mapping(page);
> if (!mapping)
That hunk belongs into migrate_page_copy()? Or is there a reason that we
need this flag that early?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists