[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801081434.14723.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:34:14 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: free_pages_check
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 13:43, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> wonder why free_pages_check mm/page_alloc.c is using bit OR than logical OR
>
> @@ -450,9 +450,9 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struc
>
> static inline int free_pages_check(struct page *page)
> {
> - if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) |
> - (page->mapping != NULL) |
> - (page_count(page) != 0) |
> + if (unlikely(page_mapcount(page) ||
> + (page->mapping != NULL) ||
> + (page_count(page) != 0) ||
> (page->flags & (
> 1 << PG_lru |
> 1 << PG_private |
Because the positive case is extremely rare, so there is no benefit (nor
any correctness requirement) for short-circuit evaluation, and we don't
want to have all the branches that it involves. I think it is 3 more
conditional jumps.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists