linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080108065239.GA23875@joi>
Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 07:52:43 +0100
From:	Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bfennema@...con.csc.calpoly.edu, jack@...e.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: convert some macros to functions

On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 03:28:15PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 21:44:26 +0100
> Marcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > There's some overly long lines here and some odd style, this should look
> > > more like:
> > These long lines were split later in "[PATCH 1/7] udf: fix coding style"
> 
> Confused.  How can patch 1/n come "later" than this one?
> 
> Your patches actually came through as "[patch] udf: ...".  ie: no
> sequence numbering.
Because there are 2 patchsets. First in third version and second in first version.
I think I join them to not confuse anyone...

> > (but I will fix it in next version of this patch).
> 
> Please fix the sequence numbering too, thanks.
Yeah. I forgot to do this before submission.

Marcin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/