[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <386072610801081832w2befcbafwe9215067f022ed5d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 10:32:48 +0800
From: "Bryan Wu" <cooloney.lkml@...il.com>
To: "Pierre Ossman" <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx>, cliff.cai@...log.com
Cc: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] split MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA
On Jan 9, 2008 4:49 AM, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@...eus.cx> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 14:40:49 -0500
> Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > i dont understand what's confusing. the Blackfin on chip host controller only
> > supports 1-bit MMC, but it supports 4-bit SD/SDIO. this is a fact. while it
> > may be a stupid decision, it is what it is, and i need the framework made
> > more flexible in order to get the Blackfin driver merged cleanly. we do
> > software for hardware, we dont do hardware.
>
> Well, since I've seen no _hardware_ differences between 4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD, "support" in this case must me "vendor will guarantee it works". And that is not the kind of "support" that needs a distinction in the code.
>
> So, again, if you feel that there is a hardware difference between 4-bit MMC and 4-bit SD then please elaborate as it is my understanding that they are identical.
>
As Mike said, the reason split this flag is because Blackfin on-chip
SDIO controller's limitation.
Cliff is working on it for a long time, so I dropped him in. Hope he
can clarify the confusing things.
Thanks
-Bryan Wu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists