[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.82.0801090448520.9570@skynet.skynet.ie>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 04:51:45 +0000 (GMT)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
cc: Kevin Winchester <kjwinchester@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] Convert drivers in drivers/char/drm to use
.unlocked_ioctl
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 03:37:50AM +0000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> > > The drm drivers in this patch all used drm_ioctl to perform their
> > > ioctl calls. The common function is converted to use lock_kernel()
> > > and unlock_kernel() and the drivers are converted to use .unlocked_ioctl
> > >
> >
> > NAK
>
> Did you actually read Kevin's patch?
Kevin's patch adds the lock/unlock to drm_ioctl which is exactly what I
don't want, I want to have drm_ioctl become drm_unlocked_ioctl, and
drm_ioctl to wrap it with the lock/unlocks, then the drivers can all
use unlocked_ioctl like Kevins patch pointing to drm_ioctl, and can
migrate over to drm_unlocked_ioctl post lock auditing, the new latest i915
driver seems to be fine with unlocked ioctls so far..
Yes I can use Kevin's patch as a base most likely, but it doesn't do what
I want yet, and I've already started to do it properly in the drm upstream
trees....
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists