linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:31:20 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc:	jbeulich@...ell.com, hch@...radead.org, pagg@....sgi.com,
	erikj@....com, matthltc@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier

On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:03:09 -0600
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
> > What are those (unidentified) add-on features doing at present?
> > Patching calls into fork.c/exec.c/exit.c?
> 
> Most likely.  I suspect we have general agreement and awareness
> that such patching is not something that sells well in Linux-land.
> And for good reason in my personal view ... such patching by loadable
> modules could open the door to compromising the integrity of Linux in
> ways that could be dangerous.
> 

err, no.

What I meant was that the providers of these mystery features are
presumably also patching into fork.c/exec.c/exit.c at the source code level
so as to enable the mystery features within their overall kernel package.

If so, this doesn't sounds terribly onerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/