[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080108163120.e1b42c30.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:31:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: jbeulich@...ell.com, hch@...radead.org, pagg@....sgi.com,
erikj@....com, matthltc@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] add task handling notifier
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 18:03:09 -0600
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > What are those (unidentified) add-on features doing at present?
> > Patching calls into fork.c/exec.c/exit.c?
>
> Most likely. I suspect we have general agreement and awareness
> that such patching is not something that sells well in Linux-land.
> And for good reason in my personal view ... such patching by loadable
> modules could open the door to compromising the integrity of Linux in
> ways that could be dangerous.
>
err, no.
What I meant was that the providers of these mystery features are
presumably also patching into fork.c/exec.c/exit.c at the source code level
so as to enable the mystery features within their overall kernel package.
If so, this doesn't sounds terribly onerous.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists