[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0801091106010.4441@dhcppc1>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:19:04 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org>
To: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@...el.suspend2.net>
cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, pavel@....cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org, serue@...ibm.com,
viro@....linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com, kzak@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On Tue 2008-01-08 12:35:09, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> >
> > For the suspend issue, there are also no easy solutions.
>
> What are the non-easy solutions?
A practical point of view I've seen only fuse rootfs mounts to be a
problem. I remember Ubuntu patches for this (WUBI and some other distros
install NTFS root). But this probably also depends on the used suspend
implementation.
Personally I've never had fuse related suspend problem with ordinary mounts
during heavy use under development, nor NTFS user problem was tracked down
to it in the last one and half year.
Regards,
Szaka
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists