linux-kernel - Re: Analysis of sched_mc_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:35:07 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	discuss@...sWatts.org,
	Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>,
	venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Chanda Sethia <chanda.sethia@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Analysis of sched_mc_power_savings


* Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> How do we take this technique to the next step where we can 
> consolidate short running jobs as well?  Did you face any difficulty 
> biasing the CPU for short running jobs?

are you sure your measurement tasks do not impact the measurement 
workload? If you use something like 'top' then try running it reniced to 
+19. (or perhaps even bound to a particular CPU, say #3, to make its 
impact isolated)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/