[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1JCbIb-0005rA-5O@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 14:48:53 +0100
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: pavel@....cz
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org, serue@...ibm.com,
viro@....linux.org.uk, ebiederm@...ssion.com, kzak@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, util-linux-ng@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/9] unprivileged mounts: allow unprivileged fuse mounts
> I'm not saying fuse is worthless. It is a nice toy for single-user
> systems. But I do not think we should be merging "allow ordinary users
> to mount their own fuse's" before issues above are fixed.
I think multi user systems are not all that interesting. And I
suspect very few of them want reliably working suspend/hibernate
(which they wouldn't get due to other issues anyway), or have weird
shutdown scripts which stop when they are unable to umount
filesystems.
For paranoid sysadmins, I suggest not enabling fuse for unprivileged
users, which is pretty easy to do: just don't set /dev/fuse to be
world read-writable (which is the default BTW).
So your reasons just don't warrant a big effort involving VFS hacking,
etc. Patches are of course welcome.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists