| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:44:12 -0500 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> Cc: "Valerie Henson" <val.henson@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 14:52:14 +0300 Al Boldi <a1426z@...ab.com> wrote: > Ok, but let's look at this a bit more opportunistic / optimistic. You can't play fast and loose with data integrity. Besides, if we looked at things optimistically, we would conclude that no fsck will be needed, ever :) > > http://infohost.nmt.edu/~val/review/chunkfs.pdf You will really want to read this paper, if you haven't already. -- All Rights Reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists