[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080109152640.GA21909@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 16:26:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@....de, pq@....fi,
jbeulich@...ell.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86: optimize page faults like all other
achitectures and kill notifier cruft"
* Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 07:18:46AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:17:37 +0000 (GMT)
> > Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> wrote:
> >
> > > So all distros with 2.6.24 kernels are useless to mmiotrace I don't
> > > see why leaving things as is until a suitable replacement mechanism
> > > can be used..
> >
> > you work for a distro.. surely you can convince your own distro to
> > carry this patch for one release? Maybe if it's this important.. so
> > can the others...
>
> But if it's good for a major distribution why is it not good for
> mainline?
it's a bit too late to get the out-of-tree module into v2.6.24, and the
revert makes little sense without the extra out-of-tree module. We at a
minimum need a clear explanation of why this functionality cannot be
provided via kprobes/systemtap.
> We had this discussion at last kernel summit and the answer was clear.
it's a clear answer 1 week after the merge window opens, but not 1 week
before the next stable kernel is released.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists