linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801090731k505c9efds56fe38b7a284446@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:31:33 +0300
From:	"Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To:	"Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe@...lesco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()

2008/1/9, Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>:
> I've only looked briefly at your patch but it seems resonable. I'll
> try to do some testing with it later.

Jesper, thank you very much for your answer!

In fact, I tested my change quite extensively using test cases for the
mmap() and msync() system calls from the LTP test suite. Please note
that I did mention that in my previous message:

>>>

Additionally, the test cases for the msync() system call from
the LTP test suite (msync01 - msync05, mmapstress01, mmapstress09,
and mmapstress10) successfully passed using the kernel
with the patch included into this email.

<<<
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/