linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080109181456.GA32432@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:14:56 +0000
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	neilb@...e.de, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] NLM: Initialize completion variable in lockd_up

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 01:05:54PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Makes sense. My only concern is that we make sure this is behavior we
> can count on in the future and not just an artifact of the current
> kthread implementation. If that's the case, then I'll plan to remove it
> on the next respin.

It's absolutely intentional and one of the reasons why the kthread
infrastructure is so much nicer than plain kthread_create :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/