linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801091210300.11709@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 12:11:14 -0800 (PST)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Dave Hansen <haveblue@...ibm.com>
cc:	travis@....com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	mingo@...e.hu, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:

> Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other patch
> set.  Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end anyway.

It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of 
earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to simplify 
the next patchset.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/