[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080109204028.GA15612@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 21:40:28 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: More breakage in native_rdtsc out of line in git-x86
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 12:25:59PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 18:48:00 +0100
> > And after all that's still by far the most common system call
> > (not only for databases; i profiled this using systemtap in some
> > loads some time ago and it usually came up with >50%)
> > and quite important for many workloads.
> >
>
> btw be careful with this; the X server uses gettimeofday in it's equivalent of udelay()...
> (and we all know how useful it is to make the delay loops faster ;-)
People tend to make jokes about optimizing the idle loop too, but they're
actually wrong. Exit latency for the idle loop is important -- it
decides how quickly you can react to load changes on idle CPUs.
For short udelays I suspect shorter exit latency is also moderately useful.
But anyways there are plenty of gtod users outside the X server.
e.g. common not user space case is packet timestamps.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists