linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080109223340.GH25527@unthought.net>
Date:	Wed, 9 Jan 2008 23:33:40 +0100
From:	Jakob Oestergaard <jakob@...hought.net>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC][BUG] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()

On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 05:06:33PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
...
> > 
> > Lather, rinse, repeat....

Just verified this at one customer site; they had a db that was last backed up
in 2003 :/

> 
> On the other hand, updating the mtime and ctime whenever a page is dirtied
> also does not work right.  Apparently that can break mutt.
> 

Thinking back on the atime discussion, I bet there would be some performance
problems in updating the ctime/mtime that often too :)

> Calling msync() every once in a while with Anton's patch does not look like a
> fool proof method to me either, because the VM can write all the dirty pages
> to disk by itself, leaving nothing for msync() to detect.  (I think...)

Reading the man page:
"The st_ctime and st_mtime fields of a file that is mapped with MAP_SHARED and
PROT_WRITE will be marked for update at some point in the interval between a
write reference to the mapped region and the next call to  msync() with
MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC for that portion of the file by any process. If there is no
such call, these fields may be marked for update at any time after a write
reference if the underlying file is modified as a result."

So, whenever someone writes in the region, this must cause us to update the
mtime/ctime no later than at the time of the next call to msync().

Could one do something like the lazy atime updates, coupled with a forced flush
at msync()?

> Can we get by with simply updating the ctime and mtime every time msync()
> is called, regardless of whether or not the mmaped pages were still dirty
> by the time we called msync() ?

The update must still happen, eventually, after a write to the mapped region
followed by an unmap/close even if no msync is ever called.

The msync only serves as a "no later than" deadline. The write to the region
triggers the need for the update.

At least this is how I read the standard - please feel free to correct me if I
am mistaken.

-- 

 / jakob

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/