[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478551A6.9050803@nortel.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 16:58:46 -0600
From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@...tel.com>
To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 11:46:03PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>>struct inode *inode = file->f_dentry->d_inode;
> And oops if that's not defined?
Isn't this basically identical to what was being passed in to .ioctl()?
Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists