[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478429DE.1090901@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:56:46 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glommer@...il.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00 of 10] x86: unify asm/pgtable.h
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Or to put it another way, what's the underlying rationale for making
>> __PAGE_KERNEL_* not include the GLOBAL flag, but including it in the pgprot
>> versions? It means that code like this in ioremap_64.c:
>>
>
> There is none, but that is not what change_page_attr() cares about.
> It just cares that you pass in the correct bits and you don't currently.
>
> I think you're missing the forrest because of all the trees currently.
>
Yeah, that may be true, but this particular tree is weird, and I'm
trying to understand what's going on here. Specifically, 64-bit
ioremap()s *don't* set _PAGE_GLOBAL, which appears to be an accident
resulting from the strange definitions of __PAGE_KERNEL_* vs
PAGE_KERNEL_*.
For example, ioremap_64.c:__ioremap() creates a vma for the io mapping,
and explicitly sets _PAGE_GLOBAL in the vma's version of pgprot - but
then it calls ioremap_page_range() to actually create the mapping, which
ends up making a non-global mapping, because its rolling its own version
of PAGE_KERNEL by using pgprot(__PAGE_KERNEL) - which is not the actual
definition of PAGE_KERNEL.
I think there's a bug around here, but I think its currently being
hidden by accident. I think my changes are correct, and they're
exposing some other bug. But I don't really understand how all this
stuff is supposed to fit together, so I'm looking for an explanation of
what's supposed to be happening - and ideally - why the current code
isn't actually buggy.
For example: is ioremap_change_attr() actually *deliberately* creating
non-global mappings? Or is it an accident? And if it really intends to
create non-global mappings, why? And why is it buggy for it to create
global mappings?
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists