[an error occurred while processing this directive]
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080110100657.GB25292@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:06:57 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, paolo.ciarrocchi@...il.com,
gorcunov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [JANITOR PROPOSAL] Switch ioctl functions to ->unlocked_ioctl
> So if I write my own driver and have never heard of ioctls running on BKL
> before I can rather be sure that I just can change the interface of the ioctl
> function, put it in unlocked_ioctl and are fine? Cool.
If you know the BKL is not needed in your code you should use unlocked_ioctl
correct.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists