[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080110105726.GD28209@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:57:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Venki Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: CPA patchset
* Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
> > > > WBINVD isnt particular fast (takes a few msecs), but why is
> > > > that a problem? Drivers dont do high-frequency ioremap-ing.
> > > > It's typically only done at driver/device startup and that's
> > > > it.
> > >
> > > Actually graphics drivers can do higher frequency allocation of WC
> > > memory (with PAT) support.
> >
> > but that's not too smart: why dont they use WB plus cflush instead?
>
> Because they need to access it WC for performance.
I think you have it fundamentally backwards: the best for performance is
WB + cflush. What would WC offer for performance that cflush cannot do?
also, it's irrelevant to change_page_attr() call frequency. Just map in
everything from the card and use it. In graphics, if you remap anything
on the fly and it's not a slowpath you've lost the performance game even
before you began it.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists