linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH x86] [15/16] Force __cpuinit on for CONFIG_PM without HOTPLUG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200801101817.23522.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:17:22 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, pavel@...e.cz,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH x86] [15/16] Force __cpuinit on for CONFIG_PM without HOTPLUG_CPU

On Thursday, 10 of January 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thursday 10 January 2008 12:26:07 Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 12:15:15PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > But your patch does:
> > > > 
> > > > +config PM_CPUINIT
> > > > +       bool
> > > > +       depends on PM
> > > 
> > > That is because arch/x86/power/cpu.c where this happens is currently
> > > 
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_PM)                += cpu.o
> > > 
> > > If it was changed to CONFIG_something else then yes that dependency
> > > should be changed too.
> > 
> > 
> > Then fix this first.
> 
> Rafael indicated he would do that,

Yes, and I'm still going to do that. :-)

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/