[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47857A82.4050005@keyaccess.nl>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 02:53:06 +0100
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@...access.nl>
To: Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...e.cz>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE breaks swsusp at least with
snd_cs4236
On 09-01-08 23:43, Ondrej Zary wrote:
Jaroslav -- in your role as ISA-PnP maintainer and Bjorn, in yours as having
been foollish enough to touch PnP recently:
> as hibernation (swsusp) started to work with my CPU, I found that my Turtle
> Beach Malibu stops working after resume from hibernation. It's caused by fact
> that the card is not enabled on the pnp layer during resume - and thus card
> registers are inaccessible (reads return FFs, writes go nowhere).
>
> During resume, pnp_bus_resume() in drivers/pnp/driver.c is called for each pnp
> device. This function calls pnp_start_dev() only when the
> PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE bit is NOT seting pnp_drv->flags. But the cs4236
> driver in sound/isa/cs423x/cs4236.c explicitly sets the .flags to
> PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE - it's value is 3 and that includes
> PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE bit.
Ehm. Isn't that a bit unexpected:
#define PNP_DRIVER_RES_DO_NOT_CHANGE 0x0001 /* do not change the state
of the device */
#define PNP_DRIVER_RES_DISABLE 0x0003 /* ensure the device is
disabled */
I'd say that disabling is changing, so isn't this just a braino where
someone meant to write 2 instead of 3?
> The same .flags value is present in many of the ALSA ISA sound drivers.
>
> Removing that .flags line caused this to appear inlog when loading snd_cs4236
> module:
> CS4236+ WSS PnP manual resources are invalid, using auto config
> CS4236+ CTRL PnP manual resources are invalid, using auto config
> CS4236+ MPU401 PnP manual resources are invalid, using auto config
>
> and the sound now works after resume!
>
> So the question is: why is this line present?
>
> Is this a bug? What's the correct fix?
Rene.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists