[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080110193839.GA2120@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:38:39 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Andre Noll <maan@...temlinux.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/1] Switch ioctl functions of drivers/scsi/sg.c to unlocked_ioctl
> If your goal is to get rid of the BKL everywhere, sure. It's not clear
> to me this is the most productive way of spending our time though.
I believe eventually eliminating ->ioctl (as opposed to ->unlocked_ioctl)
would be a productive thing to do. Still having implicit BKL semantics in
such an important interface is just wrong.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists