[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <12c511ca0801101154q224c7a43sa016190cf209d304@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 11:54:23 -0800
From: "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "john stultz" <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@...radead.org>,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
"Sam Ravnborg" <sam@...nborg.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/22 -v2] handle accurate time keeping over long delays
> Tony: ia64 also needs something like this, but I found the fsyscall asm
> bits a little difficult to grasp. So I'll need some assistance on how to
> include the accumulated cycles into the final calculation.
I'm trying to figure out all the ramifications of the new
"cycle_accumulated" field. Does it really need to be
propagated all the way to the low level assembler (which
I don't want to mess with unless I really, really have to).
Can't I do the necessary calculations in update_vsyscall()
[Where I can do them in C :-)] and keep the same low
level assembly code. I think I must be missing some
important bit of what is going on here.
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists