[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4df4ef0c0801091626u47ad255bj5e989dcecdade56f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 03:26:20 +0300
From: "Anton Salikhmetov" <salikhmetov@...il.com>
To: "Peter Staubach" <staubach@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] updating the ctime and mtime time stamps in msync()
2008/1/9, Peter Staubach <staubach@...hat.com>:
> Anton Salikhmetov wrote:
> > From: Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
> >
> > I would like to propose my solution for the bug #2645 from the kernel bug tracker:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645
> >
> > The Open Group defines the behavior of the mmap() function as follows.
> >
> > The st_ctime and st_mtime fields of a file that is mapped with MAP_SHARED
> > and PROT_WRITE shall be marked for update at some point in the interval
> > between a write reference to the mapped region and the next call to msync()
> > with MS_ASYNC or MS_SYNC for that portion of the file by any process.
> > If there is no such call and if the underlying file is modified as a result
> > of a write reference, then these fields shall be marked for update at some
> > time after the write reference.
> >
> > The above citation was taken from the following link:
> >
> > http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/mmap.html
> >
> > Therefore, the msync() function should be called before verifying the time
> > stamps st_mtime and st_ctime in the test program Badari wrote in the context
> > of the bug #2645. Otherwise, the time stamps may be updated
> > at some unspecified moment according to the POSIX standard.
> >
> > I changed his test program a little. The changed unit test can be downloaded
> > using the following link:
> >
> > http://pygx.sourceforge.net/mmap.c
> >
> > This program showed that the msync() function had a bug:
> > it did not update the st_mtime and st_ctime fields.
> >
> > The program shows the appropriate behavior of the msync()
> > function using the kernel with the proposed patch applied.
> > Specifically, the ctime and mtime time stamps do change
> > when modifying the mapped memory and do not change when
> > there have been no write references between the mmap()
> > and msync() system calls.
> >
> >
>
> Sorry, I don't see where the test program shows that the file
> times did not change if there had not been an intervening
> modification to the mmap'd region. It appears to me that it
> just shows the file times changing or not when there has been
> intervening modification after the mmap call and before the
> fstat call.
>
> Or am I looking in the wrong place? :-)
No, you are looking at the right place, but there was one thing missing
from my unit test: namely, that the "no write reference" case was
tested by commenting out the "for" loop. I should have written this
explicitly, sorry for its not having been done. The next version of
the unit test will be cleaner, I hope.
>
> > Additionally, the test cases for the msync() system call from
> > the LTP test suite (msync01 - msync05, mmapstress01, mmapstress09,
> > and mmapstress10) successfully passed using the kernel
> > with the patch included into this email.
> >
> > The patch adds a call to the file_update_time() function to change
> > the file metadata before syncing. The patch also contains
> > substantial code cleanup: consolidated error check
> > for function parameters, using the PAGE_ALIGN() macro instead of
> > "manual" alignment check, improved readability of the loop,
> > which traverses the process memory regions, updated comments.
> >
> >
>
> These changes catch the simple case, where the file is mmap'd,
> modified via the mmap'd region, and then an msync is done,
> all on a mostly quiet system.
>
> However, I don't see how they will work if there has been
> something like a sync(2) done after the mmap'd region is
> modified and the msync call. When the inode is written out
> as part of the sync process, I_DIRTY_PAGES will be cleared,
> thus causing a miss in this code.
Good catch, thanks! I totally missed the intervening sync() case.
Now I understand why the I_DIRTY_PAGES flag is not a reliable way
to detect whether there have been any write references in the
mapped area.
>
> The I_DIRTY_PAGES check here is good, but I think that there
> needs to be some code elsewhere too, to catch the case where
> I_DIRTY_PAGES is being cleared, but the time fields still need
> to be updated.
>
> --
>
> A better architecture would be to arrange for the file times
> to be updated when the page makes the transition from being
> unmodified to modified. This is not straightforward due to
> the current locking, but should be doable, I think. Perhaps
> recording the current time and then using it to update the
> file times at a more suitable time (no pun intended) might
> work.
>
> Thanx...
>
> ps
OK, I'll think over it. I believe I'll make another attempt to
fix this bug and will post a new solution for review.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/msync.c b/mm/msync.c
> > index 144a757..cb973eb 100644
> > --- a/mm/msync.c
> > +++ b/mm/msync.c
> > @@ -1,26 +1,32 @@
> > /*
> > * linux/mm/msync.c
> > *
> > + * The msync() system call.
> > * Copyright (C) 1994-1999 Linus Torvalds
> > + *
> > + * Updating the mtime and ctime stamps for mapped files
> > + * and code cleanup.
> > + * Copyright (C) 2008 Anton Salikhmetov <salikhmetov@...il.com>
> > */
> >
> > -/*
> > - * The msync() system call.
> > - */
> > +#include <linux/file.h>
> > #include <linux/fs.h>
> > #include <linux/mm.h>
> > #include <linux/mman.h>
> > -#include <linux/file.h>
> > -#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/syscalls.h>
> >
> > /*
> > * MS_SYNC syncs the entire file - including mappings.
> > *
> > * MS_ASYNC does not start I/O (it used to, up to 2.5.67).
> > - * Nor does it marks the relevant pages dirty (it used to up to 2.6.17).
> > + * Nor does it mark the relevant pages dirty (it used to up to 2.6.17).
> > * Now it doesn't do anything, since dirty pages are properly tracked.
> > *
> > + * The msync() system call updates the ctime and mtime fields for
> > + * the mapped file when called with the MS_SYNC or MS_ASYNC flags
> > + * according to the POSIX standard.
> > + *
> > * The application may now run fsync() to
> > * write out the dirty pages and wait on the writeout and check the result.
> > * Or the application may run fadvise(FADV_DONTNEED) against the fd to start
> > @@ -33,70 +39,68 @@ asmlinkage long sys_msync(unsigned long start, size_t len, int flags)
> > unsigned long end;
> > struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> > - int unmapped_error = 0;
> > - int error = -EINVAL;
> > + int error = 0, unmapped_error = 0;
> >
> > - if (flags & ~(MS_ASYNC | MS_INVALIDATE | MS_SYNC))
> > - goto out;
> > - if (start & ~PAGE_MASK)
> > + if ((flags & ~(MS_ASYNC | MS_INVALIDATE | MS_SYNC)) ||
> > + (start & ~PAGE_MASK) ||
> > + ((flags & MS_ASYNC) && (flags & MS_SYNC))) {
> > + error = -EINVAL;
> > goto out;
> > - if ((flags & MS_ASYNC) && (flags & MS_SYNC))
> > - goto out;
> > - error = -ENOMEM;
> > - len = (len + ~PAGE_MASK) & PAGE_MASK;
> > + }
> > +
> > + len = PAGE_ALIGN(len);
> > end = start + len;
> > - if (end < start)
> > + if (end < start) {
> > + error = -ENOMEM;
> > goto out;
> > - error = 0;
> > + }
> > if (end == start)
> > goto out;
> > +
> > /*
> > * If the interval [start,end) covers some unmapped address ranges,
> > * just ignore them, but return -ENOMEM at the end.
> > */
> > down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > vma = find_vma(mm, start);
> > - for (;;) {
> > + do {
> > struct file *file;
> >
> > - /* Still start < end. */
> > - error = -ENOMEM;
> > - if (!vma)
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > - /* Here start < vma->vm_end. */
> > + if (!vma) {
> > + error = -ENOMEM;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > if (start < vma->vm_start) {
> > start = vma->vm_start;
> > - if (start >= end)
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + if (start >= end) {
> > + error = -ENOMEM;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > unmapped_error = -ENOMEM;
> > }
> > - /* Here vma->vm_start <= start < vma->vm_end. */
> > if ((flags & MS_INVALIDATE) &&
> > (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED)) {
> > error = -EBUSY;
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + break;
> > }
> > file = vma->vm_file;
> > - start = vma->vm_end;
> > - if ((flags & MS_SYNC) && file &&
> > - (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> > + if (file && (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> > get_file(file);
> > - up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > - error = do_fsync(file, 0);
> > - fput(file);
> > - if (error || start >= end)
> > - goto out;
> > - down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > - vma = find_vma(mm, start);
> > - } else {
> > - if (start >= end) {
> > - error = 0;
> > - goto out_unlock;
> > + if (file->f_mapping->host->i_state & I_DIRTY_PAGES)
> > + file_update_time(file);
> > + if (flags & MS_SYNC) {
> > + up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > + error = do_fsync(file, 0);
> > + down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > }
> > - vma = vma->vm_next;
> > + fput(file);
> > + if (error)
> > + break;
> > }
> > - }
> > -out_unlock:
> > +
> > + start = vma->vm_end;
> > + vma = vma->vm_next;
> > + } while (start < end);
> > up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> > out:
> > return error ? : unmapped_error;
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists