[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478736C6.3080802@suspend2.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:28:38 +1100
From: nigel@...pend2.net
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
CC: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ breaks blktrace timestamps
Hi.
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10 2008, David Dillow wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:44 +0100, Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
>>> David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> At the moment, I'm not sure how to track this farther, or how to fix it
>>>> properly. Any advice would be appreciated.
>>> Just out of curiosity, could you try the appended cumulative patch and
>>> report .clock_warps, .clock_overflows and .clock_underflows as you did.
>> With those patches, CONFIG_NO_HZ works just fine.
Could these patches also help with hibernation issues? I'm trying
x86_64+NO_HZ, and seeing activity delayed during the atomic copy and
afterwards until I manually generate interrupts (by pressing keys).
Regards,
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists