linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: allow piping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200044878.29897.78.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 01:47:58 -0800
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc:	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...mix.at>, apw@...dowen.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
	jschopp@...tin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch.pl: allow piping


On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:41 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/11/2008 10:36 AM, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 10:34 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> If somebody is hacking kernel, I think he should know the - trick used in many 
> >> programs, but do not consider this as a nack.
> > 
> > I'm hacking the kernel, and I didn't know the - trick .. So you have
> > your testing case all in one with the patch submitter ..
> 
> OK, maybe we should base it in doc for patch submitting then?

It's in the bash docs I'm sure, it's just a matter of who ends up
reading that part of the docs.. I still think my patch is a good one ,
we could change the name to "Allow piping with out tricks" I suppose ..

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/