[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080111095654.GR6258@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:56:54 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ breaks blktrace timestamps
On Fri, Jan 11 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > > they are from the scheduler git tree (except the first debug patch),
> > > but queued up for v2.6.25 at the moment.
> >
> > So this means that blktrace will be broken with CONFIG_NO_HZ for
> > 2.6.24? That's clearly a regression.
>
> 64-bit CONFIG_NO_HZ is a new feature in v2.6.24. If it happens on 32-bit
> too and it didnt happen in v2.6.23 32-bit then it's a regression.
If blktrace worked in 2.6.23 and it doesn't in 2.6.24 because of some
option that isn't immediately apparent, then it's a regression. Period.
> all this comes from blktrace's original decision of using sched_clock()
> :-) It's not a global timesource and it's not trivial to turn it into a
> halfways usable global timesource.
Hey, it was a high res time source and the only one easily available :)
I'm fine with using another timesource, I'll take suggestions or patches
any day!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists