[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <47874E3C.76E4.0078.0@novell.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:08:44 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Jiri Slaby" <jirislaby@...il.com>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...source.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adjust/fix LDT handling for Xen
>> --- linux-2.6.24-rc7/arch/x86/kernel/ldt_32.c 2008-01-10 16:53:54.000000000 +0100
>> +++ 2.6.24-rc7-x86-xen-ldt/arch/x86/kernel/ldt_32.c 2008-01-09 13:59:50.000000000 +0100
>[...]
>> @@ -73,7 +72,7 @@ static int alloc_ldt(mm_context_t *pc, u
>> if (oldsize*LDT_ENTRY_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE)
>> vfree(oldldt);
>> else
>> - kfree(oldldt);
>> + put_page(virt_to_page(oldldt));
>> }
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -117,7 +116,7 @@ void destroy_context(struct mm_struct *m
>> if ((unsigned)mm->context.size*LDT_ENTRY_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE)
>> vfree(mm->context.ldt);
>> else
>> - kfree(mm->context.ldt);
>> + put_page(virt_to_page(mm->context.ldt));
>
>why not free_page() with all those checks if it is correct virt address which it
>brings?
I followed the combination I found elsewhere - __get_free_page/put_page
or alloc_page/free_page. I admit that I'm unclear about when/why to use
one vs. the other pair.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists