[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080111105059.GB1589@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:50:59 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch] block: fix blktrace timestamps
* Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr> wrote:
> > Correction: it was not a high res time source, it was "the
> > scheduler's per-cpu, non-exported, non-coherent,
> > warps-and-jumps-like-hell high-res timesource that was intentionally
> > called the _sched_ clock" ;-)
>
> I think the warts of cpu_clock() are fixable, except maybe
> unsynchronization on SMP which is harder.
yes - but in terms of v2.6.24, the bkltrace patch i sent is a lot less
risky.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists