[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4786CB57.9060000@tmr.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:50:15 -0500
From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
To: righiandr@...rs.sourceforge.net
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] per-task I/O throttling
Andrea Righi wrote:
> Allow to limit the bandwidth of I/O-intensive processes, like backup
> tools running in background, large files copy, checksums on huge files,
> etc.
>
> This kind of processes can noticeably impact the system responsiveness
> for some time and playing with tasks' priority is not always an
> acceptable solution.
>
> This patch allows to specify a maximum I/O rate in sectors per second
> for each single process via /proc/<PID>/io_throttle (default is zero,
> that specify no limit).
>
It would seem to me that this would be vastly more useful in the real
world if there were a settable default, so that administrators could
avoid having to find and tune individual user processes. And it would
seem far less common that the admin would want to set the limit *up* for
a given process, and it's likely to be one known to the admin, at least
by name.
Of course if you want to do the effort to make it fully tunable, it
could have a default by UID or GID. Usful on machines shared by students
or managers.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@....com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists