[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47876094.8030509@tiscali.nl>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:27:00 +0100
From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Mathieu Segaud <mathieu.segaud@...ala.cx>,
Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@...dent.ltu.se>,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Coding Style]: fs/ext{3,4}/ext{3,4}_jbd{,2}.c
Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 12:04:14PM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote:
>> Paul Mundt wrote:
>>> Take a look at how CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG is handled.
>> In drivers/pcmcia/Makefile, when CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG=y, it gives
>> EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DDEBUG
>> which causes the definition of DEBUG as a macro, with definition 1.
>>
>>> With DEBUG()->pr_debug() conversion here you've silently dropped the
>>> __func__ prefixing. Note that dev_dbg() is usually preferred when you can
>>> get a hold of a struct device pointer, as it takes care of prettifying
>>> the output with the driver name and so on, rather than the convention of
>>> adding a prefix. If you can't get at the struct device pointer, you'll
>>> probably just want to insert the __func__ prefixing manually at the
>>> callsites.
> You're still changing the semantics here. The DEBUG() does __FUNCTION__
> prefixing, while pr_debug() does not. This should be something like
> pr_debug("%s: ....", __func__, ...); instead, if you want to maintain
> consistency. Beyond that, this looks fine, yes.
Somehow I overlooked your last point. Well, the original code had no
semantics - it wasn't working - but I get your point.
Below a patch to print the __func__'s. Note that all pr_debugs are in the
same function. Maybe the function name should be printed in the first
pr_debug only? If desired, I'll send another patch.
--
Replace printk wrapper - with a syntax error - by pr_debug; keep printing
the __func__'s. (DEBUG is defined 1 when CONFIG_PCMCIA_DEBUG is set)
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
---
diff --git a/drivers/pcmcia/au1000_xxs1500.c b/drivers/pcmcia/au1000_xxs1500.c
index ce9d5c4..b4bad6e 100644
--- a/drivers/pcmcia/au1000_xxs1500.c
+++ b/drivers/pcmcia/au1000_xxs1500.c
@@ -55,12 +55,6 @@
#define PCMCIA_NUM_SOCKS (PCMCIA_MAX_SOCK + 1)
#define PCMCIA_IRQ AU1000_GPIO_4
-#if 0
-#define DEBUG(x,args...) printk(__FUNCTION__ ": " x,##args)
-#else
-#define DEBUG(x,args...)
-#endif
-
static int xxs1500_pcmcia_init(struct pcmcia_init *init)
{
return PCMCIA_NUM_SOCKS;
@@ -143,13 +137,13 @@ xxs1500_pcmcia_configure_socket(const struct pcmcia_configure *configure)
if(configure->sock > PCMCIA_MAX_SOCK) return -1;
- DEBUG("Vcc %dV Vpp %dV, reset %d\n",
+ pr_debug("%s: Vcc %dV Vpp %dV, reset %d\n", __func__,
configure->vcc, configure->vpp, configure->reset);
switch(configure->vcc){
case 33: /* Vcc 3.3V */
/* turn on power */
- DEBUG("turn on power\n");
+ pr_debug("%s: turn on power\n", __func__);
au_writel((au_readl(GPIO2_PINSTATE) & ~(1<<14))|(1<<30),
GPIO2_OUTPUT);
au_sync_delay(100);
@@ -166,7 +160,7 @@ xxs1500_pcmcia_configure_socket(const struct pcmcia_configure *configure)
}
if (!configure->reset) {
- DEBUG("deassert reset\n");
+ pr_debug("%s: deassert reset\n", __func__);
au_writel((au_readl(GPIO2_PINSTATE) & ~(1<<4))|(1<<20),
GPIO2_OUTPUT);
au_sync_delay(100);
@@ -174,7 +168,7 @@ xxs1500_pcmcia_configure_socket(const struct pcmcia_configure *configure)
GPIO2_OUTPUT);
}
else {
- DEBUG("assert reset\n");
+ pr_debug("%s: assert reset\n", __func__);
au_writel(au_readl(GPIO2_PINSTATE) | (1<<4)|(1<<20),
GPIO2_OUTPUT);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists