linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200093761.21817.32.camel@bodhitayantram.eng.vmware.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:22:41 -0800
From:	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serverworks: IRQ routing needs no _p

On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 18:14 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> I can find no reason for the _p on the serverworks IRQ routing logic, and
> a review of the documentation contains no indication that any such delay
> is needed so lets try this
> 

Looks good to me; unfortunately my Serverworks boxes got upgraded so I
can't test, but install base is really big.

Acked-by: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/