linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1200176184.19760.100.camel@brick>
Date:	Sat, 12 Jan 2008 14:16:24 -0800
From:	Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc7-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

On Sat, 2008-01-12 at 22:05 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [RFC: Would that be useful if I sent regression-fixing patches, CCed to the
> appropriate maintainers/lists, along with the reports?]

Perhaps keep the regression report as-is, but for each regression with
a patch follow up with an appropriately CC'd reply to the regression
report.  Similar in concept to the regression report being patch 0/X
or how the -stable series patches are announced?

Harvey

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/