linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended (rev. 2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0801112208030.21411-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:11:52 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <rjw@...k.pl>,
	<linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <lenb@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <pavel@...e.cz>, <mingo@...e.hu>,
	<tglx@...utronix.de>, <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] PM: Do not destroy/create devices while suspended
 (rev. 2)

On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Greg KH wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 04:49:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > err, no.  pm-introduce-destroy_suspended_device.patch demolishes
> > pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3.patch
> > 
> > Confused, giving up.
> 
> I'm confused too, I have no idea what the proper order of things should
> be either.  Anyone want to give me a hint?

Sorry for the confusion.  The correct patch to apply is 
pm-acquire-device-locks-on-suspend-rev-3 (plus the attending 
style-fixups).  It encompasses those earlier patches.

The real problem is that our current email workflow patterns don't 
provide a standardized way for maintainers to tell when a new patch 
submission is meant to override or replace an earlier submission (or 
even a set of earlier submissions).  Does anybody have some suggestions 
for a good way to do this?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/