[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <478A96BA.3040503@suspend2.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 09:54:50 +1100
From: nigel@...pend2.net
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
David Dillow <dillowda@...l.gov>,
Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...oo.fr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrace@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: CONFIG_NO_HZ breaks blktrace timestamps
Hi.
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * nigel@...pend2.net <nigel@...pend2.net> wrote:
>
>>>>> Just out of curiosity, could you try the appended cumulative patch
>>>>> and report .clock_warps, .clock_overflows and .clock_underflows as
>>>>> you did.
>>>> With those patches, CONFIG_NO_HZ works just fine.
>> Could these patches also help with hibernation issues? I'm trying
>> x86_64+NO_HZ, and seeing activity delayed during the atomic copy and
>> afterwards until I manually generate interrupts (by pressing keys).
>
> i dont think that should be related to cpu_clock() use. Does the patch
> below make any difference? (or could you try x86.git to get the whole
> stack of x86 changes that we have at the moment.) Here's the coordinates
> for x86.git:
Sorry for the delay in replying. Something seems to help, but I haven't
managed to identify what yet. I don't think it was the patch appended
because I'm on UP. If you care, I'll see if I can find the time to look
more carefully.
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists